patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Dulles Rail Opponents Discuss 'Terrible Project'

Panelists discussed drawbacks to the rail project at a forum Thursday night.

 

Opponents of the Dulles rail project said the transportation improvement will prove to be no value to Loudoun County at a community forum held by the Loudoun Taxpayers for Accountable Government (TAG) Thursday night.

“We’re trying to approach this as cost versus benefit,” said member of the Loudoun Opt Opt Citizens Group David LaRock. “It’s hard to find bonafide benefits. Using the credible studies, numbers do not justify anything. It just does not qualify as a traffic project at all.”

Panelists included David Dickinson of TAG, Tom Kramer, Loudoun Supervisor Ken Reid, and Rob Martin, a Federal Transit Administration economist.

“Whether tonight’s meeting makes or breaks anything I’m not that good of a forecaster,” Martin said. “I think it’s very, very important to alert people what a terrible project this is for the citizens of Loudoun County. Obviously, it’s a bad project for the people in western Loudoun County. It doesn’t do anything for them. But I think people overlook that it’s a bad project for eastern Loudoun County.”

Martin said there would be increased pressure to allow development in transition zones, a possible decrease in property values, and having to pay extra to employ unions.

“If it doesn’t do any good a penny is too much,” Martin said. “If some good fairy came down and gave us $3 billion I would then argue that that’s a stupid way to spend it. If you want to do something about the traffic problem in Loudoun County then you need to build some roads.”

Supervisor Ken Reid agreed. He said that prior to 2006 he was engaged in opposing the Metro. Since taking a seat on the board, Reid said he decided to take another look at the data.

“It really doesn’t look good for Loudoun County,” Reid said. “If you add up the costs we’re going to be in a hole. We’re fighting a fantasy.”

Reid said cars are becoming more efficient and have better technology. “What new technology are we going to see with Metro?” he asked.

A lot of people don’t realize how much it’s going to cost for those who live in Loudoun County, he said.

“Overwhelmingly people are amazed,” LaRock said. “I don’t want to speak for everybody but people seem to be left with the impression that this really is not a question as to whether or not we should be considering this.” 

The presentation was the conclusion TAG's series of Loudoun County ‘Town Hall’ meetings at the Rust Library

Related Topics: Board of Supervisors, Loudoun County, Loudoun Taxpayers for Accountable Government, Opt Out, and Rail to Loudoun

Vineet Aggarwal

8:03 am on Friday, May 18, 2012

"Reid said cars are becoming more efficient and have better technology." Are you kidding me? That's a justification for opposing Metro? Are all the people opposed to the Metro driving Chevy Volts? Or are people still running to the grocery store in their SUV's?

Reply
Comment_arrow

David LaRock

11:28 am on Friday, May 18, 2012

Dulles Rail is a complicated project. It is good to keep an open mind. Here is what one expert had to say. I don't think Mr. Utt was paid by rail station land owners to write this.

“Dulles rail is a poorly conceived and mismanaged project whose limited
benefits will be well below the costs to build and operate the system. As its financial problems worsen, WMAA will continue to cast an ever widening net in search of billions of dollars in subsidies from taxpayers in Virginia and the Nation to bail out a project that has been doomed to failure from the very beginning.”

Ronald D. Utt recently retired from his position as the Herbert and Joyce Morgan Senior Research Fellow at the Heritage Foundation.

Comment_arrow

Rock LaDavid

9:04 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

The Heritage Foundation? Seriously? That is like taking Fox news at their word.

Comment_arrow

Kristen H

9:28 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

David, he may not have been paid directly, but Heritage Foundation is funded by Honda, Chevron, and Exxon Mobil.

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Heritage_Foundation

Joy M.

8:18 am on Friday, May 18, 2012

This is another example of people living off their own set of "facts," which are different from those of us in touch with reality. Metro is a no-Brainerd win for Loudoun. If our Board manages to kill it, we'll regret it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

David LaRock

11:32 am on Friday, May 18, 2012

Cuccinelli who is from northern Virginia says the whole rail project is a disaster for the region and the state from the huge debts being run up, and the losses that will be incurred and subsidies needed for a facility few will use. High tolls will hit not only Dulles Toll Road users but other residents as traffic diverts.

"Not a single penny"

AG Ken Cuccinelli says he opposes the state "spending a single penny" to, as he puts it, "bail out Phase 2."

Comment_arrow

Libby

12:47 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

Cuccinelli would probably very much disagree with his own statement if the discussions were to extend Metro down the 66 corridor, helping his former Centreville and Clifton constituents.

Comment_arrow

CC Mojo

3:08 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

How does being from NoVa provide credibility? That's ridiculous, Prock (get it, Pig Rock?)

Anyhoo, Joy makes a good point about his opinion (if it mattered) changing if it benefited Centreville.

Comment_arrow

MIke

9:05 am on Saturday, May 19, 2012

I'll regret it when my tax bill comes in Joy. NO Rail to Loudoun!

Lonnie H.

9:05 am on Friday, May 18, 2012

What bubble are these guys in that they actually believe the nonsense they are spouting?
Build it, you narrow-minded short-sighted naysayers!

LaRock said "I don't want to speak for everybody" - well, obviously you lie or you wouldn't have said that - but don't worry, you don't talk for anybody but yourself and the big money paying you to say it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

David LaRock

11:37 am on Friday, May 18, 2012

Rail at any cost is not advisable. please read this to see that Opt in means we LOSE $713 million thru 2040...using Loudoun's official cost #'s

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B64IfZTFiYIAQlRaaF90SDhrWWM/edit
Opt out and we gain $600 million thru 2040

Yes that is a no-brainer!

Comment_arrow

CC Mojo

3:11 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

Prock likes to be heard, that loud voice that almost sounds like a temper tantrum because he's not getting his way.

Phase II is going to be amazing, and I really hope the big pig on a wagon can ride along the end of a train as sort of an ironic parade.

Leah M. Kosin

9:17 am on Friday, May 18, 2012

I was surprised that there didn't seem to be many people under the age of 35 at this meeting, if any. I'd be interested to hear from the younger generation as to what they think since they'll be the ones leading the county in the upcoming years.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Raek231

10:11 am on Friday, May 18, 2012

I think we've come to realize that older people yell louder.

Comment_arrow

TISH G

12:05 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

I think its great.. so do 98% of my friends... i also think we have been reaised with the awareness that public transportation is better in long run than our *older* counterparts though. People dont like change..

Comment_arrow

Victoria Glenn

5:10 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

Also surprised to see that a dozen people is called a "large turnout"

Comment_arrow

David LaRock

6:21 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

That is ironic because the young people are the ones with the most to lose.

Comment_arrow

Ellie Lockwood

6:26 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

Not only leading the County in future years, paying thru the nose for this bureaucratic fiasco. IMHO!

Comment_arrow

Concerned Citizen

6:37 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

I love change, if it will benefit me, or in this case the county. Change for change sake if foolish.

loudounguy

10:11 am on Friday, May 18, 2012

Exactly what "Roads" do they think should be built instead of metro? As far as I know, there is no way to build any new roads between Loudoun and Tysons/DC. They must live in a totally different world from me and all the people that commute around here. There's also 2 ways to look at the metro extension- and they seem to be ignoring or misunderstanding both.

One is to ask, will it pay for it's self? All the studies say yes- and that's just looking at the next 20 to 30 years. But the fact is, once you build it, it's basically going to be here forever. So the benefit doesn't end in 2030 or 2040, that's just the end of the time period they studied, the benefit keeps on going and compounding.

The second way to look at it has nothing to do with "will it pay for it's self", you look at it as needed infrastructure just like a new highway. The question is, will there be sufficient east/west capacity in 20 or 30 years to move people around. THE answer is no. There isn't sufficient capacity today, let alone in 20 years then there's 50% to 100% more people/cars. With no physical way to build a new road or substantially upgrade any existing roads, what will we do if we don't put in metro? I'm sure someone out there is thinking "we can just double deck route 7 like they do in LA". Well, I've got news for you- one, that would cost more than metro, and two, the people along route 7 in fairfax would flip. There's no way Fairfax is going to do that for "Loudoun commuters".

Reply
Comment_arrow

REDevelopingLoCo

11:46 am on Friday, May 18, 2012

Bro, let's build a highway over the Potomac, from Point of Rocks to the Kennedy Center.

Comment_arrow

David LaRock

11:49 am on Friday, May 18, 2012

Just in case you wanted an answer, you could probably do most of these for what Loudoun is being asked to pay for rail.
Results...actual traffic relief!

Dulles Rail - $500 million + ongoing expenses

Pacific and Atlantic Boulevards to reduce Rt. 28 traffic
Rt. 7 improvements from Rt. 28 to Fairfax County line
Rt. 7 interchange at Ashburn Village Blvd.
Rt. 7 interchange at Belmont Ridge Road, Rt. 659
Rt. 7 interchange at Battlefield Parkway
Rt. 7 interchange at Rt. 690
Rt. 7 Truck climbing lane, W. Market St. to Rt. 9
Rt. 9 traffic calming in Hillsboro
Rt. 15 Leesburg Bypass widen to 6 lanes
Rt. 15 traffic calming in Lucketts
Rt.15 interchange at Battlefield Parkway
Rt. 15 widening to 4-lane w/ median from Evergreen Mills Rd. to Harmony Church Rd.
Sycolin Rd. overpass of Rt. 15 Leesburg Bypass
Sycolin Rd. widening to 4-lane from Rt. 15 Leesburg Bypass to Leesburg Park& Ride
Dulles South Parkway build 4-lane from Loudoun County Parkway to Route 606 Extended
Rt. 50 widening to six lanes Fairfax County to Northstar Blvd.
Rt. 606 expanded to four lanes from Dulles Greenway to Evergreen Mills Rd.
Rt. 606 Extended built from Loudoun County Parkway to Rt. 50
Loudoun County Parkway built from Creighton Rd. to Rt. 606
Belmont Ridge Rd, Rt. 659 expanded to 4-lane w/ median from Rt. 7 to Dulles Greenway

Comment_arrow

CC Mojo

3:17 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

Prock, while all of those improvements being built and roads are shut down, detoured and generally making the commute even worse, where will all of the traffic go? How long will it take? Do you have a timeline, budget and plan for it? Shall I go on?

Comment_arrow

Melvin Summers

3:54 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

David, building all those roads and interchanges sounds just as expensive. They did the whole interchange construction on Rt 28 and it's still sit and go from sterling blvd to past the airport. Sitting in traffic, taking 40 minutes to make a 5 minute drive. I would also like to point to how expensive cars are and how the people who work our worst low paying jobs, are riding bikes to work. Maybe they deserve a dependable cheap clean form of transportation for they are members of our community too. The rail makes sense and your arguments don't. You act like Metro is personally sending you a 350 million dollar bill that you have to pay yourself.

Yes to Metro

Comment_arrow

Victoria Glenn

5:06 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

So the solution to the problem of over congested roads and high tolls is not to add alternate public transportation like the rail, but to do MORE road construction causing more delays and traffic. And how would that be paid for? Your logic amazes me LaRock. Not to mention that probably by the time all that construction is finished, things would be just as bad as they are now because of continued growth, so the never ending cycle of construction continues.

Comment_arrow

David LaRock

6:31 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

Melvin, electric trains are less efficient than cars and far less efficient than buses. Stop and think where that nice clean electric pwer comes from...power plants.
Here is a current study called, "Recapturing Global Leadership with Bus Transit." enjoy! Trains are anything but free.

http://www.itdp.org/documents/20110526ITDP_USBRT_Report-LR.pdf

and another: http://www.downsizinggovernment.org/transportation/urban-transit

Comment_arrow

Melvin Summers

12:16 am on Saturday, May 19, 2012

David, I still didn't hear you address the cost of building all your interchanges roads and black smoke producing busses. Nor did you address the lower class that can use the Metro as a cheap convenient way of bettering themselves and the community they live in. Electricity is not perfect but it is a lot cleaner for our air then the fossil fuels that the cars and diesel engine busses. Stop trying to cloud the issue with reports made by people who are so obviously against the project in the first place. The fact is Loudoun needs to evolve into the modern day. Maybe you think we should all Start riding horses around again, that would be cleaner then electricity.

Yes to Metro

Grant

10:15 am on Friday, May 18, 2012

If they kill this project they will kill any hope of Loudoun County developing any sort of culture beyond upper class white Americans.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Janie Oldham

5:17 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

What kind of 'culture' do you want and how will metro bring you that culture?
Metro means higher taxes, higher tolls, and more traffic on route 7 and route 28. Yeah, who would want to spend BILLIONS for 2.8 miles of track? It's a real no brainer, or a real head scratcher.

Tony Howard

11:06 am on Friday, May 18, 2012

Another important fact that the opponents of Metro ignore: By approving Phase 2 of Dulles Rail, Loudoun's Supervisors will create 40,000 more jobs in Loudoun County, so their constituents won't have to take the Dulles Toll Road to jobs in Fairfax and pay the high tolls, which are going up no matter what the Board decides. ("Loudoun’s Opt-Out Option Doesn’t Stop Toll Hikes" - http://www.leesburgtoday.com/news/article_5de9e776-a063-11e1-9a49-001a4bcf887a.html)

Reply
Comment_arrow

David LaRock

11:42 am on Friday, May 18, 2012

Mr. Howard, how are you man? Remember not everyone takes Dr. Fuller as seriously as you, especially since he fessed up that the station area land owners wrote him a $15,000 dollar check.
Mr. Peter Samuel of Toll Road News saw Fuller's study and said this:

Fuller's work is one bald assertion after another, stated without any explanation of an underlying methodology, but with great assurance... arrogant empty nonsense.
Fuller's work makes most traffic and revenue studies look like real scholarship by comparison. Most of them at least explain their data, discuss their assumptions and describe their methodology for forecasts, and usually provide some sensitivity analysis… how changes in key assumptions alter the results. Fuller does almost none of that. This is just fodder for the credulous.
“... this planners stuff is so feebleminded it is difficult to take it seriously.
This is total nonsense. Also counties not so burdened by the borrowing needed for Dulles Rail will have a competitive advantage in terms of taxes in attracting business and development.
Peter Samuel
Editor TOLLROADSnews
ouch!

Comment_arrow

CC Mojo

3:20 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

Fuller didn't "take" $15,000. Don't twist words, that's not playing fair.

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Dusty Smith

5:02 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

I clearly misread a comment earlier and apologize to Mr. LaRock for the mistake.

Comment_arrow

Janie Oldham

5:20 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

Tolls will lower if metro ends at Dulles and we won't have to pay the increases in taxes to pay for metro. With more housing, there probably will be a few more jobs, but where would 40,000 jobs come from?! Is that another quote from the hired gun, Dr. Fullofit?

Comment_arrow

Janie Oldham

8:38 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

How much more housing will come to Dulles? Has Loudoun learned nothing over the past 20 years? More housing means more needs for more services and that means higher taxes to pay for those services! Loudoun is the fastest growing county in the nation AND has the highest residential tax rate from here to the Gulf of Mexico. HELLOOOOO..........there's a correlation, more housing means higher taxes. End of line metro stations bring more RESIDENTIAL growth, not business growth. Look at Vienna and Dunn Loring to prove that point. Do we REALLy want more residential growth, along with the higher taxes that go with it?

Concerned Citizen

11:54 am on Friday, May 18, 2012

Mr Howard, There is no reliable study that shows 40,000 jobs being brought to LC that would not already be brought here (over 30 plus years) without Metro. If you are so concerned - as a business man - about jobs and the economy here in Loudoun, perhaps you'd like to finance Metro yourself using your chamber connections? You'd never do that because it is a lose/lose as a business investment. Please stop asking for the hard working taxpayers of Loudoun County to finance a project that is not based on transportation needs. This is not infrastructure, and it is not cost-effective or efficient. Just because tolls are "going up anyways" doesn't mean we need to double down and escalate them higher with a tax payer funded pork project.

We will get Rail to the Airport regardless of whether Loudoun Opts In, so the win-win for our county is spend nothing and reap the benefits of be adjacent to the Airport.

Reply

g.stone

12:01 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

If Metro Phase 2 was a sound Transportation project it would have garnered federal funds as did Phase 1 and every other metro project in the region for the last 20 years.
Metro phase 2 failed to meet the criteria as a transportation project by federal standards. The Obama administration , a group not shy about spending federal funds on mass transit did not fund Metro 2 and for good reason, it is not a sound transportation project. This is why the new mantra for supporters is economic development and jobs. However, they forget, ignore or never knew to begin with that million dollar transportation projects must be first and formost a transportation project. Ask yourself, why did the feds kick in funding up to reston and then close the check book on pase 2. ? It is simple metro into Loudoun was not and is not a sound investement based on the current population.
The project is called Metro to Dulles, NOT Metro to Ashburn, or Metro to Loudoun.

The numbers being touted bt those in favor of rail into Loudoun are laughable. it is

Reply
Comment_arrow

Melvin Summers

4:05 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

You cant argue that putting the rail in will help people find jobs. Think about the people who do not have many skills, low paying jobs and no money for such a luxurious belonging such as a car. Metro will give them the opportunity to look anywhere within walking distance to the train, from Loudoun county to Washington D.C. so the square miles where they can look for a job is expanded from the 2 or 3 miles closest to their house. They find people and jobs that are willing to give them skills so they can improve both themselves and the community they live in. Metro make sense.

Yes to Metro

Comment_arrow

Melvin Summers

11:00 pm on Sunday, May 20, 2012

Rob, I am sure they will have lovely bike racks for those who need them, ride your bike to the metro station, then get on a train downtown. It will help those at our lowest income levels, without the need to build "affordable housing" right next to the station. We need to take cars off our roads, and it's high time Loudoun got better than second rate public transportation.

Yes to Metro

g.stone

12:03 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

....hard to believe that anyone would tout Mr Fullers projections as the reason to proceed with this project.
Vote to Opt-out , let rail terminate at Dulles and save big !

Reply
Comment_arrow

Libby

12:52 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

The airport doesn't want to be the last station - they don't have the space to accomodate the necessary rail car facilities or the parking facilities.

RAIL TO ASHBURN! Let's not let a few loud and narrow-minded pigs (I only use the term because you jokers like to drive that pig around town) ruin this for everyone!

I'd much rather have spent the $20+ in tolls I paid the other day to the Australian company who owns the Greenway going to important infrastructure needs to Loudoun.

Comment_arrow

MIke

9:11 am on Saturday, May 19, 2012

No thanks Libby! I'm a young taxpayer, and I don't want to be stuck with the bill!!!!!!

Comment_arrow

Melvin Summers

11:07 pm on Sunday, May 20, 2012

g.stone, in my opinion, this comes down to right or wrong, and it's just plain wrong for the citizens of Loudoun and all of northern Virginia, to pay taxes to Richmond and have our public public transportation system in the condition it is in. Richmond doesn't have the kind of traffic we do because OUR money pays for their roads and public transportation. Invest now and enjoy the benefits for generations to come.

Yes to Metro

g.stone

1:03 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

Airport management was quoted two nights ago as saying they are perfectly OK with Metro ending on the Airport.
If you think that MWAA will not make this happen then I have a bridge I want to sell you.
Libby have you seen a picture of of Dulles from space ? No Room ? Sorry, they have lots of space.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Roberto Costantino

1:34 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

Agreed, it is telling that the feds are staying out of Metro Phase II. Why the double standard for Phase I? I don't know why those who advocate Phase II are not more demanding of a better deal made in good faith. Opt out; we must bide our time. It would be a big mistake to sign over a blank check to WAMTA, WMAA et al. Loudouners are just an afterthought to them.

Comment_arrow

Concerned Citizen

3:25 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

Libby, You have a problem with geography and spatial awareness. The land surrounding the airport is owned by the federal government, the same people that denied Phase II funding. If they want Metro to the airport, all they have to do is open the magic purse from the feds and release some land. It's still tax dollars in the end, but it's not Loudoun County tax dollars. If the feds want the train to Dulles, they will have to pay. If they won't pay, what does that tell you?

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Dusty Smith

4:25 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

I would disagree with the assertion that MWAA said they "are perfectly OK" with Metro ending at the airport. They said they likely would reconfigure it, possibly making it less accessible.

Comment_arrow

Concerned Citizen

6:40 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

If MWAA must reconfigure, so be it. It is all they do anyways, when has there EVER been a cogent sensible plan from this body?

William

1:25 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

An important point Mr. Cranmer (who like Rob Martin has impeccable credentials) made was that any businesses attracted to the location immediately surrounding the crime stations would have set up shop elsewhere, so there is no net gain.

I get so tired of the few rent-seeking developers who always want to game the system to leave taxpayers footing the bill, while they head to the bank. This is all about them getting high density development on their property and leaving us with all the traffic resulting from it, it's about organized labor getting more funds, and it's about the Metro system, on life support, attaching itself to Loudoun's coffers.

This project does nothing for us. The latest Lesser study shows that raffic will be as bad in 20 years, but we'll be out $1B which could have been spent on schools and road network improvements.

Reply

Roberto Costantino

1:39 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

Loudoun Rail is a glorified parking place for Metro service to and from Dulles Airport. There is no way we should put up so much money in exchange for so very little service. We need to start this again from scratch for the sake of our budget and posterity: Opt out. The dirty little secret is this is "a real estate deal, not a transportation project.."

Reply
Comment_arrow

Janie Oldham

8:48 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

Libby, who cares if the airport authority doesn't want parking on their land and would prefer that parking be on Loudoun land that Loudoun taxpayers pay for it?! The airport has plenty of land for parking lots! Rail needs to end at Dulles. Taxpayers in Loudoun shouldn't be stuck with paying for parking lots for metro, and financing this crazy land development deal that for the first time in the history of subways in the US, the government won't help pay for it.
Subways were great 100 years ago, before everyone had a car. Let's move into the 21 century and ditch the metro!

CC Mojo

3:26 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

I got to battle Rt 7, get on the toll road, pay a toll, see the construction, hit the beltway and come all the way back in time for my afternoon tea. I'm really glad you missed me!

Reply

Leah M. Kosin

3:38 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

Thank you to everyone for your comments regarding rail. Feel free to continue the discussion and thank you for keeping it clean.

Reply

Leah M. Kosin

4:14 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

I received a comment from a new reader last night regarding the Metro project. Can anyone answer his question?

Q: I am relatively new to the area. I moved here in may of 2010 to Lucketts. Recently, I have been noticing signs and other propaganda about the Metro and how it is horrible for Leesburg and the surrounding areas. I have been trying to research online as to why this is. I have found links on the patch on the subject, but I don't see the full picture. Would you know an address or link that puts in black and white why it would be good and bad for Loudoun county?

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Dusty Smith

5:43 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

That's the central debate. The county has been analyzing the project, and that information, along with upcoming dates for work sessions, outreach sessions and an input session can be found at http://www.loudoun.gov/index.aspx?NID=2100. The website for the construction project can be found at www.dullesmetro.com. Support groups, just to reiterate, are www.loudounrailnow.com/ and http://railtoloudoun.com/. A group that opposes Loudoun's participation can be found at loudounoptout.blogspot.com/. I realize this may not provide the definitive answer you seek, but those are most of the primary resources to find analyses related to the project.

Reply
Comment_arrow

David LaRock

6:29 am on Sunday, May 20, 2012

With all due respect Dusty I must take exception to your claim that Rail Now site will provide analysis. It is a sorry mouthpiece for a very skewed and outright deceptive load of propaganda, it is shameful and only reveals that this project has no real positive aspects so they must be contrived. An example, the front page statement, "Loudoun’s Gross County Product will increase almost 1,000% by 2040 || 40,000 new professional and business service jobs || Loudoun County becomes a major source of regional economic growth" Rail Now takes a projection and states it as fact. Get real man, in 2007 did anybody know we were about to entire the 2nd great Depression? Did Fuller projections take into account $13 trillion debt and other factors that might break our national economy when he made his psychic predictions?

Lots of good info at dullesmetro site. Loudoun gov. is real but too much completely undigested material.
LoudounOptOut material is regularly submitted to supervisors and Loudoun staff. We have an open rapport with officials who for the most part, are grateful for the insights our experts provide. Experts= combined experience of 2 guys 60 + years in corp. and gov big projects analysis and a couple Ivy League degrees...and Tax Pig.

Ellie Lockwood

6:40 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

I have 3 different thoughts to share. #1 When I lived in Oakton in the 80's and commuted to WRC-TV on Nebraska Ave. I was excited about Metro coming to Vienna. When it got there I realized I would be driving to Vienna, parking, boarding a train with I forget how many stops to Metro Center, transferring to the Red Line and going to more stops to Van Ness, then walking 7 blocks (in heels) to the TV station. I never did it. #2 End of the line in Vienna provided no jobs that I know of beyond those (legal or illegal) who built the hundreds of apartments, condos and townhouses. The only place you can conviently walk to is the Metro station. You need a car to grocery shop or visit a doctor unless you're seeing the plastic surgeon on Rt. 123. #3 Listen to Ken Reid. Everything I heard him say made such common sense.

Reply

Ellie Lockwood

6:48 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

Thought #4 although I could never exactly guage the time it would take me to commute, I had free parking to WRC. Today I would have been paying X to park at Vienna (if a spot was still available) X to ride the Metro in rush hour with a commute time that also would vary considerably given the fact that the system is FAR less reliable today. Sorry, I think this fiasco is a financial loser for all concerned.

Reply

Victoria Glenn

7:13 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

You can go here www.loudounrailnow.com and here www.railtoloudoun.com to get a great breakdown of all the benefits to Loudoun that will come with the Silver Line. Don't forget also there is a meeting on June 4, don't let the few loud voices be the only ones heard!

Reply

Leah M. Kosin

9:13 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

For those of you who are interested, the meeting Victoria is referring to is scheduled for June 4 at 6:30 p.m. – Dulles Rail Public Input Session - Board of Supervisors Meeting Room, Loudoun County Government Center.

Reply

Roberto Costantino

5:32 pm on Saturday, May 19, 2012

If you desire an easier comute then move eastward. Why did you move to Loudoun County in the first place if that is your priority? By the way. the Loudoun Rail is only going to transport a modest number of travelers at an enormous capital investment and expenses forever. Don't burden the universe of Loudouners because a few folks want an "easy" comute. Also, you're not going to like it, anyway. It's going to be expensive, slow, and inconvenient too.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Victoria Glenn

5:23 pm on Monday, May 21, 2012

Again saying it will be expensive to take the rail..yet I also hear people opposed to the rail as it will give criminals cheap easy access into the suburbs. Can't possibly be both.
And if you don't want the rail..why don't you move elsewhere? Not quite that simple is it?
YEs to rail!

Owen Brown

9:35 pm on Saturday, May 19, 2012

Two stops past the airport up the Greenway - no econometric study, traffic analysis, or trip to a fortune teller can get past the common sense logic that this can not 1. Be the make or break for Loudoun's Business future or 2. Dramatically impact traffic woes. It is a false choice : Metro or no Metro, Traffic relief, or no Traffic Relief, a 21st Century economy, or not. The other falsehood presented is that we can deterministically predict what impact this decision will have on our future in 2040. 30 years hence - really? Business ecosystems will have dramatically been altered, technology will have led to significant changes in both transportation alternatives and work habits, and stakeholder preferences will have evolved. Let us think about the events that have most significantly impacted Loudoun's demographics and population in the last 30 years: globalization, networks, the collapse of communism, and 9/11. How many of these would have been predicted in 1982? These studies are not to be believed with high confidence. Once again - here is what we do know. 2 stops = lots of money.

Reply

Marybella

9:06 am on Sunday, May 20, 2012

I am 33 yearsold. From my own experience living in Fairfax. I don't think that would solve the problem .. go to Fairfax.. there is always traffic issues ... also, train brings rats and I mean in all terms... look at all the issues that people have to deal with specifically safety. Have you been to sprinfield mall, Ballston mall or Pentagon City mall. I DON'T WANT THE METRO TO RUIN LOUNDON!!!!! Some people feel like we have to be green by going with the Metro. Then CAR POOL!!!!!!!!!!

Reply

Melvin Summers

12:41 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

It's about time Loudoun got good public transportation. You say it costs too much, you say we should wait until we have a larger population. By then its going to be a crisis on our roads and it will cost twice as much to build. Let them get it done the most affordable they can, by continuing the project with all the equipment and man power already on location.

Yes to Metro

Reply

Leave a comment