.

McDonnell Signs Mandatory Ultrasound Law

Amended version of the bill requiring transabdominal imaging prior to an abortion becomes law in Virginia.

By Michael Bodine
Capital News Service

RICHMOND – Gov. Bob McDonnell has signed the much-debated bill that requires ultrasound testing before abortions into law.

The bill, proposed by Delegate Kathy Byron (R-Lynchburg) has been among the most hotly contested social issues in this year’s General Assembly. It even sparked national criticism and .

McDonnell signed House Bill 462 into law on Wednesday. Because the measure was amended multiple times, it first had to endure two votes from each house of the General Assembly this session.

After signing the legislation, McDonnell issued a statement that acknowledged both sides of the mandatory-ultrasound debate. He also stated why he saw it as a necessary measure.

“As difficult as an abortion decision is, the information provided by ultrasounds, along with other information given by the doctor pursuant to current law and prevailing medical practice, can help the mother make a fully informed decision,” McDonnell said. “I believe that we become a more compassionate society when we enact reasonable legislation to protect innocent human life.”
The Virginia Society for Human Life expressed its gratitude for the bill’s passage.

“In spite of an aggressive and deliberately deceitful public campaign waged by pro-abortion forces against passage of this bill, the members of the Virginia General Assembly did the right thing by passing this reasonable bill,” said the society said Wednesday in a press release. “The women and unborn children of Virginia owe a debt of thanks to (McDonnell) and the General Assembly for supporting this pro-woman law.”

The original wording of Byron’s bill would have mandated the use of a transvaginal probing procedure, but the bill was amended at McDonnell’s request to require only a transabdominal ultrasound.

About 1,000 protesters stationed themselves on the steps of the Capitol Saturday in a final attempt to stop McDonnell from signing the bill. Many protesters ignored police officers who commanded them to leave. About 30 people were arrested.

Democratic legislators quickly voiced their distaste for the governor’s signing of the bill. Delegate Kaye Kory (D-Fairfax) said McDonnell’s views on invasive government procedures did not line up.

“Gov. McDonnell believes that federal health care reform is ‘big government’ and that airport pat-downs are too invasive,” Kory said. “I can’t think of a single bill passed this session that is more intrusive and contains more government meddling into private, personal decisions than a requirement to get an unnecessary medical procedure solely to satisfy a rigid social agenda.”

Former Democratic Gov. Tim Kaine spoke out against the legislation. He said the issue distracts from areas where legislators need to find common ground to allow the country to “create jobs, grow our economy, educate our workforce and tackle our deficit.”

“Deviations into the social debates of the past not only distract from those challenges, but they actually hurt our reputation as a world-class place to do business,” said Kaine, who is campaigning for a U.S. Senate seat.

Brian Moran, who chairs the Democratic Party of Virginia, cited the bill in a fundraising plea for his party. He has asked people who oppose the bill to make campaign donations to the Democrats.

[Capital News Service is an entity of Virginia Commonwealth University.]

Eliana March 10, 2012 at 02:09 PM
“The women and unborn children of Virginia owe a debt of thanks to (McDonnell) and the General Assembly for supporting this pro-woman law.” Pro-woman?? Hard as I try, I fail to see how anyone can spin this legislation as "pro-woman" by any stretch of the imagination. But - hey - it sounds good, and for all too many uninformed people in today's society, that's all that is needed.
Kat DeMille March 11, 2012 at 11:57 AM
All it takes is one pregnancy that is tubal and you better believe that woman is going to sue for all the money she can get simply because she can. It is a sad fact that this society has become sue happy. A simple sonogram gives sound medical information that the patient is not going to be honest (did you see a doctor? how far along are you really?) the majority of the time when comes down to a desperate situation. If that doctor performs an abortion and the woman is beyond the time limits he can be the one in trouble. The sonogram protects him as well as the mother for not only medical but professional. Someone who cannot see that this is a compromise between two sides is someone who wears blinders and believes only their side is right which is a shame because you will never know compassion for a view other than your own. Before spouting something ideological try actually spending some time at an actual clinic- you may learn something.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something